Ultimate Comparison: RPA vs Excel Programming - ByteScout
  • Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • Ultimate Comparison: RPA vs Excel Programming

Ultimate Comparison: RPA vs Excel Programming

RPA and Excel both are responsible for bringing a revolution in the computer science world. RPA is responsible for bringing automation while Excel too is responsible for bringing a kind of automation in processing large sets of data but it is a little different from RPA. This post explains the difference between RPA and Excel.

RPA vs Excel Programming

Robotic process automation (RPA) platform is used to develop a software robot (or ‘RPA bot’) to reproduce the same activities that employees do when they complete a job involving things like Excel. Excel is a data management tool. Many companies use spreadsheets daily to handle, create, manage, and design data for use over a wide range of business processes.
In the case of RPA, however, unlike with Macros, automation does not only happen within the Excel environment.  You can automate repetitive Excel tasks by using Macros. However, this requires programming skills.
In RPA, Bots run at the performance layer of applications and other methods, which enables them to automate activities seamlessly over a variety of software platforms. Excel decreases the amount of time that must be consumed doing primary computing chores, saving users up for more complicated problem-solving and exercises.
RPA decreases the probability of human error that grows with many, monotonous keystrokes and jobs. Excel cannot be configured to a broad range of rule-based tasks.
RPA is a no-code weapon, which suggests that users can automate their daily chores without any programming and with minimum interference from IT. Excel is a standalone package, not completely blended with other business operations; it does not give enough control.
RPA is a perfect program for companies that desire to improve their methods without having to carry the loss or division of an ample IT change project. Excel is not created for testing. It’s not unusual to have interconnected spreadsheet data spread across various folders, computers, offices.
If any company is using Robotic Process Automation tools, then it is not needed to use and apply for any new IT support. In Excel, extracting data from various sections, merging that data, and compiling the information can be very time-consuming.

RPA Best Practice vs Excel Best Practice

The simple description could be that Excel is a spreadsheet medium, while RPA is Robotic process automation software. Spreadsheet applications are automated worksheets that visualize data in a tabular arrangement. Each data is saved in “cells” and can be managed or calculated by formulas. Diagrams, tables, or presentations can be produced later to display a selective insight.

When running Excel, users must previously have a conception of where the data requires to guide them to obtain important insights. Since Excel stores data in a tabular arrangement, this indicates that the route to an insight includes planning out the key, writing formulas and visualizations, and interpreting the data. This makes the method of digging down into data to be less resilient, making it more difficult to search data on a smaller level.

In Excel, users first shape the data and then generate visualizations like graphs and charts to analyze visualization work. For this, one must require a broad knowledge of how Excel’s traits work. Although Excel is a strong tool to utilize, building and managing monotonous reports, building visualizations, and digging down into charts of data needs some high-level knowledge of its features.

On the other hand, RPA is a rules-based software. Typical methods can be defined by particular commands. RPA bots need to be configured and if the commands of the method can not be processed, then that method is not suitable for RPA. AI can be equipped with complicated rules and even such rules that are not obvious to human workers. Yet, automation of such methods needs accurate measurement of RPA outputs since there may be instances where AI mistakenly recognizes rules.

Yet, some methods have so many undefined commands that even if they are rules-based, they need too much time to understand all applications via discussions with domain specialists. Such methods are not good applicants for automation. Automating a method that is transforming every small thing is not suitable for automation because programmers will need a lot of time on resources. Well-built and stable methods are good applicants for automation.

In RPA, removing traditional practices can automate methods even more efficiently. RPA bots depend on screen scraping and may include errors. Also, placing two automation arrangements for a rule does not make sense. Yet, even if a method is not suitable for automation as a whole, it could probably be divided into configurable sub-methods that give huge advantages when automated.

Make Your Robots – Try RPA Tools

Check this video to compare RPA and Excel programming:

In situations where many other software packages, applications, and line-of-market operations are handled to get the job done, however, it can be testing to move data between Excel and other software tools effectively.

One of the best business advantages of RPA is that you don’t have to compose codes. No one needs to have programming experience for getting RPA tools. It also gives versatility to the users in courses of shifting from any other area to RPA. You can even shift any complicated method to the machine with some small effort.

Robotic Process Automation gives tools to save data so that you can interpret data when you need insight, summarizing, or building tasks. The data saved in RPA tools also assist users to implement different procedures such as weather reports, timelines, etc.

Excel is often produced by people who have very limited IT expertise. Ultimately, spreadsheet files become a profoundly private user-developed package. So, when a newbie takes over as a member of a company or organization development, the newcomer may have to begin again from zero.


About the Author

ByteScout Team ByteScout Team of Writers ByteScout has a team of professional writers proficient in different technical topics. We select the best writers to cover interesting and trending topics for our readers. We love developers and we hope our articles help you learn about programming and programmers.